Because of some stupid license isusses it can`t be made portable. This browser is far away from beeing the bst. Who knows if Apple will make it better or if it will just be a better looking IE with no modifications allowed. Sum up, Safari is a good looking browser and that is all it is at this time. The list goes on and on ad infinitum, ad nauseaum. For enterprise level computing, nothing beats Linux. For graphics creation nothing beats a Mac. When it comes to certain things there is nothing worse than something else. I am not calling you childish, just your arguement that everyone would switch to a Mac if they used one. Saying that people need to buy a Mac and that using Winblows is for window lickers is nothing but spouting childish arguements. However, I will still stick with a Winblows OS for now as it is better at everything that I need it to do. I own many macs ranging from Quadra840A/V's through a Power Mac 9600 to a G3 500MHz. I use both and I will stay with FF for its customization and its faster surfing. However, FF wins as it can be added upon and is faster than Safari in general browsing. They both are very simple and elegant in their own design and layout. They both are usable out of the install and require no configs. It works right out of the install and requires no configuration to work with 90% of websites out there. Second, FF is easy and simple with no fuss no muss. For what it does though as it is intended to do, it is unrivaled. It is not the best system or OS in the world by far. Mac is (for its uses) the greatest environment produced. I won't return to it before the final and I don't think I'll start it then.įirst, we are not knocking the power of Mac. 100 MB together with QuickTime (BTW it wasn't clearly written during installation that I'll have to perform 2 unstallations, it should be one process). These are impressions from a 3 minute test. I'll say again - it may change in the final release. Text selection looks nice, but doesn't work well with light blue letters (anybody who tried it knows what I'm talking about.). Possibly they claim this because of a super sophisticated precashing, connection management or so, I didn't read carefully, but I know one thing - it doesn't load pages faster than FF does. In fact there are no features that could be configurable but they could at least allow some interface customization. What does it have? Popup blocker? Java and flash plugins? lol. The main thing I don't like about it is lack of features. (But after the latest presentation of the Leopard's best feature - a new desktop, I have doubts). It's still a beta, many things may change, I still believe that Apple will not release something so poor. I have a bit different opinion - it's a useless crap, nowhere better than IE6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |